Escobedo v. Illinois | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued April 29, 1964 Decided June 22, 1964 | |
Full case name | Escobedo v. Illinois |
Citations | 378 U.S. 478 (more) 84 S. Ct. 1758; 12 L. Ed. 2d 977; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 827; 4 Ohio Misc. 197; 32 Ohio Op. 2d 31 |
Prior history | Defendant convicted in Cook County criminal court; Illinois Supreme Court found confession inadmissible and reversed, February 1, 1963; on petition for rehearing, Illinois Supreme Court affirmed conviction, 28 Ill. 2d 41; cert. granted, 375 U.S. 902 |
Holding | |
Suspects have the right to a lawyer while being questioned by police. If police refuse to allow a lawyer, anything the suspect says cannot be used in court. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Goldberg, joined by Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan |
Dissent | Harlan |
Dissent | Stewart |
Dissent | White, joined by Stewart, Clark |
Laws applied | |
Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments |
Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case decided in 1964. The Court ruled that suspects in crimes have the right to have a lawyer with them while they are being questioned by the police. This case was decided just a year after the Court ruled in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), that indigent (poor) criminal defendants had a right to be assigned free lawyers at trial.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search